Temporary Advertisements:
Ad
Ad
Ad
279 MILLION CPFs – RECEITA FEDERAL 2026 (EXPOSED)
by BuddhaGroup - Friday July 17, 2026 at 09:06 PM
#1
[JUSTIFY] [IMG width="742px" size="4096x961"]http://i.ibb.co/rG9Y3gD9/receita-federal-logo-1-1.png[/IMG]


A few months ago, we found a legacy system and uncovered a backup of a database related to the Receita Federal, created in 2019 and simply left behind. 248 million CPFs.

The Receita Federal lied. They issued an official statement calling it fake news, but the statement itself was fake news. They shifted the blame to another leak, probably the Serasa breach from 2021, which also denies any involvement. But that doesn't make sense. The Serasa leak has nothing to do with this backup. Different years, different data, different columns, different volume. There's no connection. They didn't investigate, didn't compare, just denied it and called us liars. In their note, they didn't even mention opening an investigation. Just denial.

This isn't the first time we've seen governments lie. But it's the first time the lie has been this poorly made.

Now we're releasing one of the tables from the data aggregate, with 279 million rows, extracted directly from the government's active system. This is just one of many tables in the complete dataset. It's not recycled. It's current. The data has been converted to .db format, with an index only on the CPF column for fast queries. The full file size is 69.6 GB.

We're offering two free samples:

Sample with 10,000 records without birth date filter: [COLOR=rgb(84, 172, 210)][URL unfurl="true"]https://anonfilesnew.com/s/xtBJ-CkXgUC[/URL][/COLOR]
Sample with 10,000 records of people born in 2026: [COLOR=rgb(84, 172, 210)][URL unfurl="true"]https://anonfilesnew.com/s/w1Rat4Qew1k[/URL][/COLOR]

Across the entire database, 226,425,954 out of 279,008,638 (81.15%) have a regular cadastral status. The remaining 18.85% have other statuses such as Suspensa, Cancelada por Óbito sem Espólio, Pendente de Regularização, Cancelada por Multiplicidade, Nula, and Cancelada de Ofício, which are detailed in the table below. The database exceeds the living population because CPFs of deceased individuals remain registered with a canceled status, a standard procedure in any government system worldwide. IBGE estimates the living population at 213,562,666, which is clearly inconsistent with the Receita Federal's data. The Receita Federal, which boasts about its high security standards, didn't detect the 2019 backup, nor the recent extraction. To this day, no investigation has been opened. No expert has been assigned. Just an empty statement.

Did the 279 million rows we released match your numbers, Brazilian Government? Or was it just a coincidence?

We challenge the Receita Federal and any security specialist to confront the released data with the official records.

2026 database: $10,000.
2019 database: $1,300.

We accept BTC and XMR, with a preference for XMR.

This is the last time we speak to journalists. We have access to more critical systems. Maybe we'll show up again, but not to explain anything.

We serve governments and companies for specific targets. Contact us via Signal.

Signal: empty.08

TABLE COLUMNS:

NU_CPF, NU_ANO_EXERCICIO, NU_ANO_OBITO, NO_BAIRRO, NU_CEP, CO_MUNICIPIO_RESIDENCIA, CO_MUNICIPIO_NATURALIDADE, CO_NATUREZA_OCUPACAO, CO_OCUPACAO, CO_PAIS_NACIONALIDADE, CO_PAIS_RESIDENTE_EXTERIOR, CO_SEXO, CO_SITUACAO_CADASTRAL, CO_UNIDADE_ADMINISTRATIVA, DS_COMPLEMENTO_LOGRADOURO, DT_INSCRICAO_CPF, DT_INSCRICAO_CPF_ORIGEM, DT_NASCIMENTO, DT_NASCIMENTO_ORIGEM, DT_ATUALIZACAO, DT_ATUALIZACAO_ORIGEM, DS_EMAIL, ST_ESTRANGEIRO, ST_RESIDENTE_EXTERIOR, NO_LOGRADOURO, NO_PESSOA, NO_MAE_PESSOA, NO_PAIS_NACIONALIDADE, NO_PAIS_RESIDENTE_EXTERIOR, NO_SOCIAL_PESSOA, NU_LOGRADOURO, NU_TELEFONE, TP_LOGRADOURO_RESIDENCIA, SG_UF_RESIDENCIA, SG_UF_NATURALIDADE, DT_ULTIMA_CARGA

CADASTRAL STATUS:

0 Regular – 226.425.954 (81,15%)
2 Suspensa – 1.665.323 (0,60%)
3 Cancelada por Óbito sem Espólio – 28.940.563 (10,37%)
4 Pendente de Regularização – 1.361.025 (0,49%)
5 Cancelada por Multiplicidade – 4.860.936 (1,74%)
8 Nula – 96.187 (0,03%)
9 Cancelada de Ofício – 15.658.650 (5,61%)

HIGHLIGHTS:

The database contains 144,376 CPFs with invalid check digits (0.05% of the total). These CPFs exist in the raw database, but they never show up in the Receita Federal's internal consultation system, because the application validates the CPF algorithm before displaying the data. So the database is full of garbage, but the system hides it. Clean output, dirty source.

Example:

CPF 03163264700 (correct) – ALAN CARLOS DE PAULA GOMES – updated 2026-04-04
CPF 03163264702 (incorrect) – ALAN CARLOS DE PAULA GOMES – updated 2025-05-07

The second CPF has an invalid check digit. Same name, same birth date, different CPF, different update date. This is not a typo. It's a clear failure in their data management.

This invalid CPF is in the database and marked as regular, but the consultation system refuses to display it because it fails the validation. The Receita Federal is essentially hiding the problem instead of fixing it.

People over 100 years old with regular status: 502,068.
Oldest individuals recorded in the database, all without a death flag (marked as alive):
[/JUSTIFY]
CPF | Name | DT_NASCIMENTO | DT_INSCRICAO_CPF | DT_ATUALIZACAO | UF
00638267471 | WANG YANG | 1190-01-05 | 2025-06-05 | | PE
10784679860 | DAVI MARTINELLI FREITAS | 1201-09-20 | 2025-07-01 | | SP
04522395752 | RUFINO FERNANDEZ GONZALEZ | 1878-11-16 | 2026-05-29 | | RJ
05172721720 | ADELINO MARTINS | 1880-05-28 | | 2024-05-31 | RJ
80470785004 | ADELIA MENDES PINTO | 1884-07-07 | 1995-11-27 | 2024-05-22 | RS
[JUSTIFY]
As you can see, the Receita Federal doesn't even know how to handle Brazilians' own data. Inconsistencies, impossible dates, contradictory records, and invalid CPFs sitting right in the database. And they still claim to have the highest security standards.
[/JUSTIFY]
Avoid scams. Always use our Official Middleman Service for transactions.
Reply
#2
Great sharing
Reply
#3
well it seems to me that having those inconsistencies like the DV it would be hard to pin this leak to the RFB since why tf would they store wrong cpfs in their systems? Given those inconsistencies (probably typos) looks like it's a third party enriched database. Still great tho.
Reply
#4
nobodyrelevant Wrote:Initially, Receita Federal denied the existence of this leak, making exactly the argument you mentioned. At the time, they claimed that it was merely a compilation of data from older leaks disclosed in 2021. Later, however, they revised their position and stated that the 2019 backup (containing 248 million CPF records) originated from ancine.gov.br. You can find the report covering Receita Federal’s statement here:

https://www.poder360.com.br/poder-tech/hackers-dizem-ter-obtido-dados-de-279-milhoes-de-cpfs-fisco-nega

Regardless of that statement, we are completely certain about the origin of this database because we were the ones who extracted it.

More recently, we also managed to extract a database from a system that remains active.

You may find it unusual that there are inconsistencies in the data, and that is indeed something worth noting. However, in 2024, Brazil’s Federal Court of Accounts (TCU) conducted an audit of the CPF database and identified 272.9 million CPF records, a number exceeding the country’s population, along with other inconsistencies related to data quality and integrity. These findings were published by the TCU itself. You can read more about them here:

https://capitaldigital.com.br/tcu-revela...al-do-pais
https://bf.st/attachments/2803/
Reply
#5
Other bkp? Other company (not ANCINE)?
Reply
#6
nobodyrelevant Wrote:Other bkp? Other company (not ANCINE)?
There are two distinct datasets here:

The 2019 backup came from a gov.br system. The Receita Federal itself later confirmed this in a statement to Poder360. It was a legacy database hosted on a government server, and we found it there.

The 2026 dataset is different. It didn't come from a backup left on any server. It came directly from an active database that is still in use. We extracted it ourselves from a live system.

So to answer your question directly: no, the 2026 dataset didn't come from Ancine or any other company. It came from a different source, a live government system that is still operational.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  SELLING ACCESS TO AFRICAN COUNTRY COURT CASE SYSTEM WarlordMistress 9 1,926 Yesterday, 03:30 PM
Last Post: IPAddress
  SOLD OUT vexio.ro Wieko 5 1,503 Yesterday, 10:54 AM
Last Post: vonamij374
  SELLING [Top Quality] Bank of America Business Account StealthHUB-IO 74 13,013 Yesterday, 10:29 AM
Last Post: StealthHUB-IO
  SELLING Premium Quality Static Residential Proxies for your Banks - PayPal - Cashapp & more StealthHUB-IO 21 2,827 Yesterday, 10:27 AM
Last Post: StealthHUB-IO
  SELLING PayPal Accounts - High Quality Aged/Old (2016,2017,2019 Accounts). StealthHUB-IO 76 15,198 Yesterday, 10:26 AM
Last Post: StealthHUB-IO

Forum Jump:


 Users browsing this forum: 1 Guest(s)